Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ilahia Trust Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 18 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/11/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ilahia Trust Vs Commissoner of Income Tax (Kerala High Court)

Facts- The assessee, being an educational trust, claimed income tax exemption for the Assessment Year 2010-11. AO called up the assessee to explain advance of sum of INR 72,45,000. The advance made since is not compliant with the general purpose of running the Trust, the AO called upon the assessee to show-cause as to why the provisions of Section 13(1)(c) of the Act should not be invoked and disallow the advances made by the assessee in favour of M/s. VUS Timbers.

Secondly, the assessee has described Mr. Varghese in the list of sundry creditors. The total amount shown against the name is INR 21,27,846. It was alleged that the assessee couldn’t place on record the details of effecting TDS on the amount paid to Varghese. The failure to comply with Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has been noted and the amount claimed towards capital investment has been disallowed by the AO.

Conclusion- The advance amount of INR 72,45,000 was diverted for personal benefit of an interested party, who is mentioned in section 13(3). Therefore, there is clear violation of provisions of section 13(1)(c).

The following finding of the Tribunal was upheld-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031