Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surya Alumex Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Surya Alumex Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Rule 4(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 do not permit CENVAT Credit in respect of part of value of capital which represents duty of amount on such capital goods or which the manufacturer or producer of output service claims as depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act. Once the full depreciation was claimed, the respondent could not claim availment of cenvat credit on capital goods. Corrective measures taken by the appellant but in subsequent financial year definitely does not make good irregular availment of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930