Case Law Details
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
IT held that At page 60-61 of its order dated 28th December, 2020, certain observations were made about Mr Cyrus Mistry. One fact, which was inadvertently missed out, was that the information furnished by Mr Mistry was in response to a notice. Under these circumstances, the observations made in para-38, which is now renumbered on account of typographical mistake as para-48, is modifies.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT
1. As some inadvertent errors have crept in the order dated 28th December, 2020 passed by us, disposing of this appeal, we deem it fit and proper to rectify as under :-
1. At page 60, paragraph 47 is, on account of a typographical error, numbered as paragraph 37.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
