This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) is not maintainable if charges are not specific– ITAT
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Hafeez S Contractor Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007-08 & 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Brief of the Case
Mumbai ITAT held In the case of Shri Hafeez S Contractor vs. ACIT that penalty u/s 271(1) (c) cannot be imposed in those cases where no specific charges are mentioned in penalty notice. In the given case the AO has not specified that as to which limb the notice was issued, i.e., whether it is issued for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
Facts of the Case
During the course of search proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee has claimed expenditure in respect of commission paid to two parties namely (a) M/s Nischal Corpo...




