Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) is not maintainable if charges are not specific– ITAT
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) is not maintainable if charges are not specific– ITAT

Case Law Details

Case Name
Shri Hafeez S Contractor Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2007-08 & 2008-09
Advertisement
Brief of the Case Mumbai ITAT held In the case of Shri Hafeez S Contractor vs. ACIT that penalty u/s 271(1) (c) cannot be imposed in those cases where no specific charges are mentioned in penalty notice. In the given case the AO has not specified that as to which limb the notice was issued, i.e., whether it is issued for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. Facts of the Case During the course of search proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee has claimed expenditure in respect of commission paid to two parties namely (a) M/s Nischal Corpo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *