Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT (Central) Vs Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 1002 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/10/2014
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04 and 2004-05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT (Central) Vs Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd. (Bombay High Court)

In this manner, the amendment provided by Finance Act, 2003 in Section 43B put on par the benefit of deductions of tax, duty, cess and fee on the one hand with contributions to various Employees’ Welfare Funds on the other. All this came up for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd. (supra). The Tribunal in the case at hand relied upon the said judgment. There is no reason to fault the order passed by the Tribunal. We are of the view that the decision of the Supreme Court in Alom Extrusions Ltd. applies to employees’

We hold that both employees’ and employer’s contributions are covered under the amendment to Section 43B of I.T. Act and the Alom Extrusions judgment. Hence the Tribunal was right in holding that payments thereof are subject to benefits of Section 43B.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

1. This order disposes of the above two appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the I.T. Act) which involve common questions of law, which read as under:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031