Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pravardhan Seeds (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Pravardhan Seeds (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Conclusion: CIT should not stop merely on finding that the order was erroneous but also had to establish that the order of AO was prejudicial to the interests of revenue. Thus, revision could not be made in such a case and the order of AO was restored. Held: CIT observed that AO did not examine the fact that whether the production of seeds by adopting planned, scientific and specialised procedure in departure from basic agricultural operation in the instant case could still be claimed as agriculture. Further, he observed that he did not even c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031