This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
HC expresses concern at tendency of Dept to file unnecessary appeals u/s. 260-A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pr. CIT(A) Vs M/s Bank Note Paper Mill (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Pr. CIT (A) Vs M/s Bank Note Paper Mill (Karnataka High Court)
HC expresses concern and anguish at the tendency of the Revenue Department to file unnecessary appeals u/s. 260-A of the Act even though the issues are ex facie covered by the decision of the jurisdictional High Courts or even the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The substantial question of law essentially means that a question of law which is not already settled by the Constitutional Courts can only fall within the ambit of Section 260-A of the Act and therefore repetitive filing of such appeals by the Tax Depar...
