This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowance of administrative expenses claimed against LTCG
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Amit Capital & Securities (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Amit Capital & Securities (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Merely because assessee’s had claimed administrative expenditure which was not acceptable to Revenue, that by itself would not attract penalty under Section 271(1)(c) if there was absence of concealment and / or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
Held: Assessee was a share trading and investment company. AO determined the total income by treating capital gains as business income and it appeared that assessee had claimed all administrative expenses as deduction against long term capital gain which was re...




