Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik Vs S S Engineers & Contractors (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik versus S S Engineers & Contractors ORDER NOs. A/511 & 512/12/CSTB/C-I ST/CO/54 OF 2012 APPEAL NO. ST/35 OF 2012 JUNE 7, 2012 ORDER Ashok Jindal, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No. AKP/199/NSK/2011 dated 28/11/2011 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nashik. 2. The facts relevant in this case are as follows: 2.1 The respondent, M/S. S.S Engineers & Contractors, Nashik (SSE&C in short) entered into two agreements with their cl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Tapan Ray says:

    Goodwill comes under Intellectual property services and not under business auxillary services and service tax is imposable as per the below definition given by CBEC.

    Intellectual property services (other than copyrigh
    ts) –
    (1) Intellectual property
    emerges from application of intellect, which may be
    in the form of an invention, design,
    product, process, technology, book, goodwill etc.
    In India, legislations are made in
    respect of certain Intellectual Property Rights (i.
    e. IPRs) such as patents, copyrights,
    trademarks and designs. The definition of taxable
    service includes only such IPRs
    (except copyright) that are prescribed under law fo
    r the time being in force. As the
    phrase ‘law for the time being in force’ implies su
    ch laws as are applicable in India, IPRs
    covered under Indian law in force at present alone
    are chargeable to service tax and
    IPRs like integrated circuits or undisclosed inform
    ation (not covered by the Indian law)
    would not be covered under taxable services.
    (2) A permanent transfer of intellectual property
    right does not amount to rendering
    of service. On such transfer, the person selling t
    hese rights no longer remains a ‘holder
    of intellectual property right’ so as to come under
    the purview of taxable service. Thus,
    there would not be any service tax on permanent tra
    nsfer of IPRs.
    (3) In case a transfer or use of an IPR attracts ce
    ss under Section 3 of the Research
    and Development Cess Act, 1986, the cess amount so
    paid would be deductible from
    the total service tax payable
    (refer Notification No.17/2004-S.T., dated 10-9-200
    4).
    [ C.B.E &C Circular No.80/10/2004-S.T dated 17.09.2
    004 ]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930