Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Cosmic Kitchen Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 5549/Del/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/05/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Cosmic Kitchen Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)- The only ground taken in this appeal, filed by the assessee, is that the learned CIT(A) erred in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 2,70,744/- in respect of pre-operative expenses allocated to fixed assets. It is also mentioned that he erred in holding that the expenses were revenue in nature and not linked with installation of various assets.

The question is covered by the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Challapalli Sugars Limited Vs. CIT (supra) and CIT Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, (1975) 98 ITR 167, in which it has been held that accepted accountancy rule for determining cost of fixed assets is to include of expenditure necessary to bring such assets into existence and to put them in working condition. Therefore, the question was decided in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Having considered the facts of the case, we are of the view that they are similar and, therefore, the ratio of this case is applicable.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

(DELHI BENCH ‘B’ NEW DELHI)

Cosmic Kitchen Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. shraddha Tripathi says:

    Sir, please tell me that a fixed asset should be recognized when it is ready to use and under control of client. Pendency of Legle proceedings (eg fixed asset is pending to be transferred in client name) doesn’t matter.

  2. shraddha says:

    Sir, please tell me that a fixed asset should be recognized when it is ready to use and under control of client. Pendency of Legle proceedings (eg fixed asset is pending to be transferred in client name) doesn’t matter.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031