Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT V/s The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (2011-TIOL-35-ITAT-MUM)
Related Assessment Year :
Premium paid in excess of the face value of the security held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (‘HTM’) category which has been amortised over the period remaining till maturity is allowable – rules Mumbai Tax Tribunal Facts • The Assessee had a unit at Bhopal which was not functioning since the assessment year 1997-98. • The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (‘the assessee’) was a company engaged in the business of banking. • The assessee had filed its Return of Income claiming loss on valuation of investments which included an amount towards amortization of premium paid for securities hel...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930