Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT V/s The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (2011-TIOL-35-ITAT-MUM)
Related Assessment Year :
Premium paid in excess of the face value of the security held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (‘HTM’) category which has been amortised over the period remaining till maturity is allowable – rules Mumbai Tax Tribunal Facts • The Assessee had a unit at Bhopal which was not functioning since the assessment year 1997-98. • The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (‘the assessee’) was a company engaged in the business of banking. • The assessee had filed its Return of Income claiming loss on valuation of investments which included an amount towards amortization of premium paid for securities hel...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930