Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT V/s The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (2011-TIOL-35-ITAT-MUM)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Premium paid in excess of the face value of the security held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (‘HTM’) category which has been amortised over the period remaining till maturity is allowable – rules Mumbai Tax Tribunal
Facts
• The Assessee had a unit at Bhopal which was not functioning since the assessment year 1997-98.
• The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd (‘the assessee’) was a company engaged in the business of banking.
• The assessee had filed its Return of Income claiming loss on valuation of investments which included an amount towards amortization of premium paid for securities hel...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

