Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Section 206AA starts with the words “Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act”. This is a non-obstante clause which means that the provisions of section 206AA shall override other provisions of the Act. If we go through Section 90(2), it provides that ‘Where the Central Government has entered into an agreement with the Government of any country outside India or specified territory outside India, as the case may be, under sub-section (1) of section 90, for granting relief of tax, or as the case may be, avoidance of double taxation, then, in relation to the assessee to whom such agreement applies, the provisions of this Act shall apply to the extent they are more beneficial to that assessee. Does this mean that new section 206AA overrides section 90(2), so that, notwithstanding the provisions of section 90(2), deduction of TDS shall be at the rate of 20% wherever the non-residents have not obtained/furnished PAN? The DTAAs are entered into by the Executive with the power and rights given under Article 73 of the Constitution. So far, the law has been clear that Article 73 will have the effect of the DTAA overriding the Act, as the Executive has to exercise jurisdiction keeping in mind DTAA obligations and commitments made. This proposition has been also been reiterated in CIT Vs. Davy Ashmore Ltd (190 ITR 626 CAL), CIT Vs. R.M.Muthiah (202 ITR 508 KAR), CIT Vs. VR.S.R.M.Firm (208 ITR 400 MAD), Arabian Express Ltd of United Kingdom and Others Vs. UOI (212 ITR 31 GUJ) and CIT Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Trust (144 ITR 146 AP)

In a recently reported judgement of the Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Siemens Aktiongesellschaft (310 ITR 320), Their Lordships while interpreting the provisions of the Act in relation to Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements held that “The rule of referential incorporation or incorporation cannot be applied when dealing with a treaty between two sovereign nations. Though it is open to a sovereign Legislature to amend its laws, a DTAA entered into by the Government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 90(1) of the Income tax Act, 1961, while considering section 90(2) has to be reasonably construed”. The CBDT has also clarified in Circular No: 333 dated 02-04-1982 as follows “The correct legal position is that where a specific provision is made in the DTAA, that provision will prevail over the general provisions contained in the Income Tax Act, 1961. In fact the DTAA which have been entered into by the Central Government under section 90 of the Income tax Act, 1961 also provide that, the laws in force in either country, will continue to govern the assessment and taxation of income in the respective country, except where provisions to the contrary have been made in the agreement”.

Meanwhile, the CBDT Chairman has made it clear that there was “no legal lacuna” in stipulating a higher TDS rate of 20 per cent on payments made to non-residents who do not have or furnish PAN to the deductor. The CBDT Chairman could have elaborated a bit more and specified the grounds on which he felt that there was no legal lacuna in the amendment. For the Non-residents the choice appears to be, (a) either obtain and furnish PAN to avoid 20% TDS or (b) suffer 20% TDS, then obtain PAN, file the Income tax Return and get the excess tax if any refunded! I am sure every one would prefer the first option.

Source: Email from CA.M.K.Krishnan

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. nemish says:

    at what rate tds should be dedcucted in case if it is a expense of last year and amt for this expense is remitted to foreign party in current year . whether rate of 20.60%apply or new rate of 25.75% apply. 

  2. Prasath says:

    What is the TDS rate to made the payment for “Contractor” who is regiter in india as a Branch (Company regiter in out said india) all business doing in india (AllReceipt and Payment)

  3. CA.KALAISELVI says:

    what is the procedure for getting PAN for Nonresident by deductor? What is the TDS rate for test fees paid paid to non resident having PAN and no DTAA is there?

  4. Mahavir Kapshe says:

    Circular: No. 728, dated 30-10-1995 states that the rate more benefitial to the Assessee be applied.

    “It is hereby clarified that in view of the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Act, in case of a remittance to a country with which a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement is in force, the tax should be deducted at the rate provided in the Finance Act of the relevant year or at the rate provided in the DTAA, whichever is more beneficial to the assessee.”

    According to me the applicability of TDS @ 20 % for non availability of PAN would arise only where DTAA is not entered into.

  5. KPS says:

    @ Rame Gowda: Sir, It may also happen that after one – two year I T Dept. may send notices to PAN Holder to furnish return of income / details based on the PAN. In such a scenario it is not a feasible solution for Foreign National / Company to attend to the same.

    General Points:
    Moreover, these kind of provisions will make Import of services costlier since the foreign companies will be loading the tax burden in one way or another in pricing, which will result into more Forex Outflow. Our country today import Services / Goods in far excess of Exports.

    It appears that the Central Govt. wants to overide provisions of DTAA signed few years back (where the financial situation of our country was not very healthy at least as per S & P Rating which gave Greece a good rating just before the fall out).

    There are various other checks and balances mechanism to ensure no revenue leakages. E.g. There is no mechanism under Service Tax provisions for the same cases of Payment of Serv. Tax under reverse charge mechanism for Import of Services. There are numerous assessee who either are not aware or are not making payment of Serv. Tax before or after remittance for the said services. If the Govt. introduce a mechanism like 15CA and 15CB for Service Tax it will keep the transaction on hold by Banks until the certificates are not furnished with Remittance Documents. There are many more areas where Govt. can monitor and ensure proper collection of money rather than introducing controversial points and retrospective amendments.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031