Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Radhesham Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Anand Radhesham Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Mumbai) Allotment Letter = Agreement-ITAT Grants 56(2)(x) Relief, Limits Addition to 50% Share The key issue before the ITAT was whether addition u/s 56(2)(x) (₹1.31 crore) based on stamp duty value at registration date was justified, where the property was booked much earlier. The Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee with important findings: On applicability of proviso to Section 56(2)(x): The assessee had received an allotment letter dated 08.05.2013 fixing consideration and payment schedule Substantial payments were made through banking chan...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Is After 1-4-2021: ITAT Bangalore Selling & Marketing Expenses Cannot Be Disallowed Due to Ledger Nomenclature Error: ITAT Bangalore Executive Search Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty Under India–Netherlands DTAA: ITAT Mumbai No TDS on Reimbursement of Common Legal Expenses: ITAT Mumbai BSNL VRS Employees Eligible for Full Exemption of Retrenchment Compensation & Leave Encashment: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031