Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai)
AO made addition of ₹50 lakh u/s 68 treating loans from alleged entry operators (Sampada Chemicals Ltd. & P. Saji Textiles Ltd.) as accommodation entries based on Investigation Wing report. CIT(A) deleted the addition.
ITAT held:
AO relied only on third-party information: No independent verification of bank statements or transactions
Addition partly beyond scope of reopening: Reasons recorded were only for one party, but addition made for two
CIT(A) also erred: Deleted addition without conducting proper verification
Both authorities faile...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


