Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Smt. Uma Rugmini (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Smt. Uma Rugmini (ITAT Bangalore) CIT(A) Cannot Admit Fresh Evidence Without AO’s Opportunity – Violation of Rule 46A; Matter Remanded The assessee, a housewife, had not filed her return of income. Based on information from the Insight Portal regarding large financial transactions and bank deposits, the AO initiated reassessment proceedings and completed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144, making additions towards sale consideration, bank deposits and other financial transactions as the assessee failed to respond to notices or furnish details during assessment. Before the CIT(A),...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031