This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition U/s 69 for Alleged On-Money Deleted – Third-Party Statements & Pen-Drive Data Without Cross-Examination Held Invalid – ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- TaxGuru Citation
- 2026 taxguru.in 2542
- Case Name
- Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Addition u/s 69 for Alleged On-Money Deleted – Third Party Statements & Pen-Drive Data Without Cross Examination Not Valid Evidence – ITAT Mumbai
AO made addition u/s 69 alleging cash “on-money” payment for shop purchase based on statements of builder group employees and excel/pen-drive data found during search in third party premises. Assessee denied any cash payment and contended that entire consideration was paid by cheque as per agreement. CIT(A) confirmed addition.
ITAT held that addition cannot be sustained merely...
Author Info
