Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Addition u/s 69 for Alleged On-Money Deleted – Third Party Statements & Pen-Drive Data Without Cross Examination Not Valid Evidence – ITAT Mumbai AO made addition u/s 69 alleging cash “on-money” payment for shop purchase based on statements of builder group employees and excel/pen-drive data found during search in third party premises. Assessee denied any cash payment and contended that entire consideration was paid by cheque as per agreement. CIT(A) confirmed addition. ITAT held that addition cannot be sustained merely on third-party s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930