Case Law Details
Case Name : Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Addition u/s 69 for Alleged On-Money Deleted – Third Party Statements & Pen-Drive Data Without Cross Examination Not Valid Evidence – ITAT Mumbai
AO made addition u/s 69 alleging cash “on-money” payment for shop purchase based on statements of builder group employees and excel/pen-drive data found during search in third party premises. Assessee denied any cash payment and contended that entire consideration was paid by cheque as per agreement. CIT(A) confirmed addition.
ITAT held that addition cannot be sustained merely on third-party s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


