Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Cherie Tandon Saldahna Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Cherie Tandon Saldahna Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Allotment Date Stamp Value Applicable u/s 56(2)(x) – Registration Value Cannot Be Adopted Where Consideration Paid Earlier by Cheque – ITAT Mumbai AO made addition u/s 56(2)(x) on purchase of flat by adopting stamp duty value on date of registration and treated difference of ₹1.14 Cr as income. Assessee contended that flat was allotted in 2011, full consideration paid through banking channel before allotment and hence stamp value on allotment date should apply as per proviso to Sec 56(2)(x). CIT(A) confirmed addition. ITAT held that allotment ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930