Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nikhil Maheswari Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nikhil Maheswari Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Reopening Beyond 3 Years Quashed – Approval by PCIT Instead of PCCIT u/s 151(ii) Invalid – Jurisdictional Defect Fatal – ITAT Kolkata ITAT Kolkata quashed reassessment holding that where notice u/s 148 was issued beyond three years, mandatory approval had to be obtained from PCCIT as per Sec 151(ii), whereas AO obtained sanction only from PCIT-5, Kolkata. Tribunal noted that reopening dated 30.07.2022 for AY 2017-18 was clearly beyond limitation period and therefore approval from wrong authority vitiated jurisdiction. Relying on Agnello Oswin Dias (...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031