Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nikhil Maheswari Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nikhil Maheswari Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Reopening Beyond 3 Years Quashed – Approval by PCIT Instead of PCCIT u/s 151(ii) Invalid – Jurisdictional Defect Fatal – ITAT Kolkata ITAT Kolkata quashed reassessment holding that where notice u/s 148 was issued beyond three years, mandatory approval had to be obtained from PCCIT as per Sec 151(ii), whereas AO obtained sanction only from PCIT-5, Kolkata. Tribunal noted that reopening dated 30.07.2022 for AY 2017-18 was clearly beyond limitation period and therefore approval from wrong authority vitiated jurisdiction. Relying on Agnello Oswin Dias (...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031