Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suneeta Sekhri Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suneeta Sekhri Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) PCIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 on Penny Stock LTCG Where AO Conducted Detailed Enquiry & Issue Is Debatable – ITAT Mumbai The ITAT Mumbai quashed the revision order passed u/s 263 for AY 2018-19, holding that the PCIT wrongly assumed jurisdiction in a case involving alleged bogus LTCG on sale of penny stock shares. The Tribunal noted that the AO had conducted detailed enquiry during reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, examined demat statements, bank statements, contract notes & trading details, and thereafter made an addition by denying ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for VSI Contribution & Section 244A Interest Skill Development Institution Qualifies as ‘Education’; Section 12AA/12AB Registration Restored: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable for Transport Booking Agent; Income Restricted to 3%: Pune ITAT Investor Cannot Be Denied Section 10(35) Exemption for Mutual Fund Violations: Pune ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Vague Reasons & Lack of Supporting Material: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031