Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suneeta Sekhri Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suneeta Sekhri Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) PCIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 on Penny Stock LTCG Where AO Conducted Detailed Enquiry & Issue Is Debatable – ITAT Mumbai The ITAT Mumbai quashed the revision order passed u/s 263 for AY 2018-19, holding that the PCIT wrongly assumed jurisdiction in a case involving alleged bogus LTCG on sale of penny stock shares. The Tribunal noted that the AO had conducted detailed enquiry during reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, examined demat statements, bank statements, contract notes & trading details, and thereafter made an addition by denying ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification Bogus Purchases: Only Profit Element Taxable – ITAT Upholds 12.5% Estimation View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930