Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suneeta Sekhri Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suneeta Sekhri Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) PCIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 on Penny Stock LTCG Where AO Conducted Detailed Enquiry & Issue Is Debatable – ITAT Mumbai The ITAT Mumbai quashed the revision order passed u/s 263 for AY 2018-19, holding that the PCIT wrongly assumed jurisdiction in a case involving alleged bogus LTCG on sale of penny stock shares. The Tribunal noted that the AO had conducted detailed enquiry during reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, examined demat statements, bank statements, contract notes & trading details, and thereafter made an addition by denying ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Cash Withdrawn Earlier Cannot Become ‘Unexplained Cash’ on Re-Deposit: ITAT Bangalore SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031