Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harish Hari Gandhi Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harish Hari Gandhi Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 43CA Relief for Marginal Variations: ITAT Mumbai Applies 10% Tolerance Retrospectively and Orders DVO Reference The Mumbai Bench “E” of the ITAT partly allowed the appeal of Harish Hari Gandhi (AY 2017-18) and granted substantial relief from additions made under section 43CA on sale of flats by a real-estate developer. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of ₹18.57 lakh on the ground that the agreement value of three flats (Nos. 705, 502 and B-703) was lower than the stamp-duty value. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition by holding that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930