This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Addition for Demonetisation Cash Deposits Supported by Agricultural Income: ITAT Surat
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramanbhai P. Viradiya HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Surat
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ramanbhai P. Viradiya HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
The appeal concerned addition of ₹12.50 lakh treated as unexplained cash under section 68 for AY 2017–18, arising from cash deposits during the demonetization period. The case was selected for limited scrutiny. The assessee explained that the deposits came from agricultural income, supported by ownership of over three hectares of land, crop sales such as cotton, corresponding withdrawals, and documentary evidence including bills and vouchers. The Tribunal found the explanation satisfactory and held that the cash deposits were properly explained...
