Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramanbhai P. Viradiya HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramanbhai P. Viradiya HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) The appeal concerned addition of ₹12.50 lakh treated as unexplained cash under section 68 for AY 2017–18, arising from cash deposits during the demonetization period. The case was selected for limited scrutiny. The assessee explained that the deposits came from agricultural income, supported by ownership of over three hectares of land, crop sales such as cotton, corresponding withdrawals, and documentary evidence including bills and vouchers. The Tribunal found the explanation satisfactory and held that the cash deposits were properly explained...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930