Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subhash Suryakant Phadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subhash Suryakant Phadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Holds Redevelopment Compensation / Hardship Allowance as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable as Income The Mumbai ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and held that compensation of ₹53.50 lakh received from a developer in connection with redevelopment of a residential flat constitutes a capital receipt, not chargeable to tax as “income from other sources.” The amount comprised ₹25 lakh paid as compensation for the developer’s failure to adhere to agreed redevelopment terms and ₹28.50 lakh towards members’ beneficial rights, cor...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930