Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Doriswamy Gopi Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Doriswamy Gopi Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Reopening Quashed for Wrong Assumption That No Return Was Filed — Section 292B Cannot Cure Jurisdictional Defect The Bangalore ITAT (SMC Bench) quashed the reassessment for AY 2017-18 holding that the reopening under section 147 was initiated on a patently incorrect assumption of fact—that the assessee had not filed a return of income—when, in fact, the return had been filed on 18.11.2017. The Tribunal noted that this incorrect assumption was recorded twice in the reasons and could not be brushed aside as a typographical error. Relying on Sagar Ente...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930