Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bilasraika Sponge Iron India Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bilasraika Sponge Iron India Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Cash Seized by Police: ITAT Hyderabad Remands Section 68 Addition for Non-Consideration of Assessee’s Reply The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT set aside the addition of ₹30 lakh made under section 68 on account of cash seized by the police from the assessee company’s employees and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal noted that although the AO recorded in the assessment order that the assessee had not filed any reply to the show-cause notice, the record clearly showed that the a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930