Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deepak Devidas Sajnani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Deepak Devidas Sajnani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 69 Limited to Yearly Outflow: ITAT Restricts Unexplained Investment to Actual Payment Made The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16, holding that an addition under section 69 on account of investment in immovable property cannot exceed the amount actually paid during the relevant year. The assessee, a non-resident individual, had purchased an immovable property with total consideration (including stamp duty) of about ₹2.56 crore. While the Assessing Officer treated the entir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930