This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Unexplained Investment Limited to Actual Payment Made in the Year: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Deepak Devidas Sajnani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Deepak Devidas Sajnani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Section 69 Limited to Yearly Outflow: ITAT Restricts Unexplained Investment to Actual Payment Made
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16, holding that an addition under section 69 on account of investment in immovable property cannot exceed the amount actually paid during the relevant year.
The assessee, a non-resident individual, had purchased an immovable property with total consideration (including stamp duty) of about ₹2.56 crore. While the Assessing Officer treated the entir...


