Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deepak Devidas Sajnani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Deepak Devidas Sajnani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 69 Limited to Yearly Outflow: ITAT Restricts Unexplained Investment to Actual Payment Made The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16, holding that an addition under section 69 on account of investment in immovable property cannot exceed the amount actually paid during the relevant year. The assessee, a non-resident individual, had purchased an immovable property with total consideration (including stamp duty) of about ₹2.56 crore. While the Assessing Officer treated the entir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930