Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajit Kanakaraddi Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajit Kanakaraddi Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court) Faceless Reopening Reaffirmed: Karnataka HC Again Quashes Section 148 Notices Issued by Jurisdictional AOs The Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench) quashed a batch of reassessment notices issued under section 148 for multiple assessment years, holding that the jurisdictional Assessing Officer lacked authority to initiate reassessment proceedings outside the faceless regime mandated under section 151A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioners challenged reassessment notices issued in March 2024 and August 2024 on the ground that, after the CBDT...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031