Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdulwahid Abdulkarim Qureshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abdulwahid Abdulkarim Qureshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Penalty Cannot Survive Without Quantum Addition: Section 271(1)(c) Levy Deleted The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty of ₹47.94 lakh levied under section 271(1)(c), holding that once the underlying quantum addition itself is deleted, the penalty has no legs to stand on. In this case for AY 2016-17, the Assessing Officer had levied penalty at 100% of tax sought to be evaded on an addition of ₹1.38 crore, treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68. The CIT(A)/NFAC had confirmed the penalty. How...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930