Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Associated Projects Infra Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Associated Projects Infra Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Section 41(1) Addition Not Automatic: Creditor’s Write-Off Requires Verification The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that an addition under section 41(1) cannot be sustained merely because a creditor has written off an amount as bad debt in its books. In the present case, the Assessing Officer treated the amount of ₹56.23 lakh as income of the assessee on the premise that the creditor’s unilateral write-off resulted in cessation of liability. The Tribunal observed that section 41(1) applies only where a l...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930