This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Disallowance on alleged fictitious loss without incriminating material cannot be sustained
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance on account alleged fictitious trading loss in absence of any direct incriminating material is not sustainable. Accordingly, CIT(A) rightly deleted the disallowance and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Thus, the present appeal by revenue is dismissed.
Facts- The assessee, a partnership firm, has been carrying on the business of trading in shares, derivatives and futures & options for several years. Post scrutiny assessment, AO recorded reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped...




