Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Disallowance on alleged fictitious loss without incriminating material cannot be sustained

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance on account alleged fictitious trading loss in absence of any direct incriminating material is not sustainable. Accordingly, CIT(A) rightly deleted the disallowance and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Thus, the present appeal by revenue is dismissed. Facts- The assessee, a partnership firm, has been carrying on the business of trading in shares, derivatives and futures & options for several years. Post scrutiny assessment, AO recorded reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *