Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nitesh Ranjan Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nitesh Ranjan Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) 26AS Mismatch Due to Timing Difference Not Income Escapement: Year of TDS Credit vs Year of Income- ITAT Allows Appeal for Limited Verification Delhi ITAT ‘SMC’ Bench in Nitesh Ranjan vs DCIT (ITA No.7135/Del/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 15-12-2025) allowed the assessee’s appeal for limited purposes, holding that mismatch between Form 26AS and receipts shown in books, arising purely due to difference in year of recognition, cannot be straightaway treated as undisclosed income. Assessee, a sole proprietor carrying on business as M/s Ascentiq Engineers &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930