This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
VAT-Accepted Turnover Can’t Be Retaxed as Unexplained Cash
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- KDJP Steels Private Limited Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
KDJP Steels Private Limited Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre (Delhi High Court)
Suspicion Is Not Evidence- Cash Sales During Demonetisation Cannot Be Branded as Unexplained: Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹48 Lakh Addition- Books Accepted, VAT Turnover Accepted—69A Cannot Be Invoked: ITAT Delhi Rules in Favour of Assessee
deleted addition of ₹48 lakh made on account of cash deposits during demonetisation, holding that cash deposited out of recorded cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained u/s 69A when books of account are accepted.
Assessee, engaged in trading of iron & st...





