Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Tribunal Flags Error in Applying Section 14A to Non-Yielding Investments

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hincon Holdings Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Hincon Holdings Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Stock-in-Trade Isn’t Investment: ITAT Mumbai Remands 14A Disallowance for Fresh Verification Mumbai ITAT (SMC Bench) held that while computing disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D, shares and mutual funds held as stock-in-trade must be excluded, and only those investments which actually yielded exempt income can be considered. The assessee, an NBFC, earned dividend income of ₹11.93 lakh from mutual funds held as stock-in-trade, whereas the AO mechanically computed disallowance by including non-current investments which had not yielded any exempt income, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA RAJESH KUMAR
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangaluru, Karnataka
Articles Published: 41

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *