Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Smt. Samiksha Mahajan (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Smt. Samiksha Mahajan (ITAT Delhi) Bank Valuation ≠ Incriminating Material: Delhi ITAT Restricts Section 69 Addition & Deletes Estimated STCG in Search Assessment The Delhi Bench of the ITAT dismissed both the Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s cross-objection, holding that a bank valuation report obtained u/s 133(6) cannot be treated as incriminating material for making additions in a search assessment u/s 153A, and that capital gains cannot be recomputed on pure estimates without invoking section 50C. In the search assessment for AY 2005-06, the AO made an addition of ₹10...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031