Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Smt. Samiksha Mahajan (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Smt. Samiksha Mahajan (ITAT Delhi) Bank Valuation ≠ Incriminating Material: Delhi ITAT Restricts Section 69 Addition & Deletes Estimated STCG in Search Assessment The Delhi Bench of the ITAT dismissed both the Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s cross-objection, holding that a bank valuation report obtained u/s 133(6) cannot be treated as incriminating material for making additions in a search assessment u/s 153A, and that capital gains cannot be recomputed on pure estimates without invoking section 50C. In the search assessment for AY 2005-06, the AO made an addition of ₹10...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031