Crucial Rule 46A evidence can’t be ignored: ITAT Agra remands section 68 addition
CA Vijayakumar Shetty
16 Dec 2025
279 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : Om Parkash Banwani Vs ACIT (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Parkash Banwani Vs ACIT (ITAT Agra)
The Agra Bench of the ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A), NFAC and restored the appeal for de novo adjudication, holding that crucial additional evidence filed under Rule 46A cannot be brushed aside.
The Assessee, engaged in manufacturing hulled sesame seeds, had received
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.



Comments are closed.