Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harishchandrasinh Pratapsinh Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Harishchandrasinh Pratapsinh Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Petrol pump cash sales explained: 69A & 115BBE addition deleted despite NFAC rejection of Rule 46A

ITAT Ahmedabad allowed assessee’s appeal & deleted addition of ₹2.07 crore made u/s 69A r/w 115BBE on account of cash deposits during demonetisation. Assessee, a petrol pump operator, demonstrated through quantitative stock records of petrol & diesel, purchase invoices from oil companies, VAT-wise sales registers, daily cash sales, stoc

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031