Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harishchandrasinh Pratapsinh Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harishchandrasinh Pratapsinh Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Petrol pump cash sales explained: 69A & 115BBE addition deleted despite NFAC rejection of Rule 46A ITAT Ahmedabad allowed assessee’s appeal & deleted addition of ₹2.07 crore made u/s 69A r/w 115BBE on account of cash deposits during demonetisation. Assessee, a petrol pump operator, demonstrated through quantitative stock records of petrol & diesel, purchase invoices from oil companies, VAT-wise sales registers, daily cash sales, stock valuation statements & bank statements that cash deposits were nothing but regula...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031