Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prestigious Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prestigious Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Pursuant to earlier ITAT remand for de novo adjudication, AO accepted ₹1 crore compensation as capital receipt but again added ₹50 lakh u/s 68, noting deficiencies in confirmation from creditor M/s Treatwell Investments Pvt. Ltd., absence of company stamp, no cheque details, bank entry not reflecting payer identity, & failure to explain immediate source. CIT(A) confirmed addition, holding that Assessee failed to establish identity, creditworthiness & genuineness of transaction, particularly as creditor’s return showed NIL inc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031