Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Kumar Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Kumar Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) When JDA Agreement Is Executed, Registered Later, & Eventually Cancelled — AO Must Re-examine Assessee filed return of ₹5,30,350 but AO reopened u/s 147 on receiving information of a Joint Development Agreement with Ambe Bhagwati Marketing Construction Pvt Ltd. AO treated execution/registration of JDA as “transfer” u/s 2(47)(v) r/w s.53A & assessed long-term capital gain of ₹85,52,221 in AY 2015-16 u/s 144/147. CIT(A) upheld reopening, framed an extensive discussion on JDA taxation prior to 45(5A), held that “transfer” occurred on ex...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031