Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shankar Math Vs ITO(E) (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shankar Math Vs ITO(E) (ITAT Delhi) Mandatory Penalty Under 272A(2)(e) Not Automatic: Communication Gap & Covid Count as Reasonable Cause -ITAT Gives Relief to Trust Assessee, a charitable trust, was levied penalty of ₹2,42,300 u/s 272A(2)(e) @ ₹100 per day for 2,423 days’ delay in filing return, which CIT(A)/NFAC upheld. Before Tribunal, Revenue argued that Assessee failed to show any reasonable cause. Tribunal, however, accepted that for a trust, communication lapses between management & auditor cannot be ruled out, particularly since penalty proceedings began during the Covid-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930