Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shankar Math Vs ITO(E) (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shankar Math Vs ITO(E) (ITAT Delhi) Mandatory Penalty Under 272A(2)(e) Not Automatic: Communication Gap & Covid Count as Reasonable Cause -ITAT Gives Relief to Trust Assessee, a charitable trust, was levied penalty of ₹2,42,300 u/s 272A(2)(e) @ ₹100 per day for 2,423 days’ delay in filing return, which CIT(A)/NFAC upheld. Before Tribunal, Revenue argued that Assessee failed to show any reasonable cause. Tribunal, however, accepted that for a trust, communication lapses between management & auditor cannot be ruled out, particularly since penalty proceedings began during the Covid-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930