Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

938 Days Delay Condoned as Appeal Was Wrongly Treated as Withdrawn

Case Law Details

Case Name
Andaz Trading & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement Andaz Trading & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai condones delay of 938 days and remands back case for fresh reconsideration for non- consideration of submissions Tribunal considered an appeal arising from the dismissal of the assessee’s quantum appeal by the CIT(A), who treated it as withdrawn on the assumption that the assessee had opted for the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme (VSVS). The assessee contended that the VSVS declaration was filed only for penalty matters under sections 271D and 271E, not for the assessment order under section 143(3). After ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

Manohar Samal
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: Ratan Samal Associates LLP
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 31

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *