This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delay of 207 Days Not a Barrier as Tribunal Orders Fresh Merits-Based Hearing
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- SPA Soaps & Surfactants Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
SPA Soaps & Surfactants Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
The appeal concerned an assessment for AY 2017–18, where the Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹20.31 lakh as unexplained cash deposits under a best-judgment assessment framed under Sections 144 and 147. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee’s appeal at the threshold, citing a delay of 207 days and refusing to condone it. The assessee appealed to the ITAT, arguing that the matter should be decided on merits and asserting readiness to substantiate its case. Considering the principles of na...






