Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rakesh Chopra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rakesh Chopra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) No 143(2) Notice & Wrongly Ignored Valid Return – Reassessment Quashed ITAT Delhi Deletes ₹50.50 Lakh Addition Assessee declared income of ₹2,65,566. The case was reopened u/s 147 and a fresh return was filed in response to notice u/s 148 on 30.10.2018. Assessment was completed u/s 147/143(3) on 12.12.2018 by adding ₹50,50,000 u/s 69 as unexplained investment in Milestone Capital Advisors Ltd. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on 05.09.2024. Before Tribunal, Assessee demonstrated that the return filed on 30.10.2018 had been duly e-verified through Aadhaa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930