This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Eye Estimated Excess Stock Cannot Trigger GST Section 130 Confiscation: SC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Additional Commissioner Vs. PP Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Additional Commissioner Vs . PP Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Excess Stock Found on Estimation Cannot Trigger Confiscation: Courts Rule Correct Procedure Under Sections 73/74; Confiscation Proceedings Invalid When Stock Discrepancy Is Based on Eye Estimation, Hold Courts; GST Authorities Must Use Sections 73/74 for Excess Stock; Section 130 Not Applicable Without Intent to Evade; Survey-Based Excess Stock Cannot Justify Section 130 Action, Supreme Court Declines Interference; Improper Invocation of Section 130 Quashed: Courts Emphasize Mandatory Assessment Frame...






