Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Geet Reality Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Geet Reality Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Ex-Parte CIT(A) Order Set Aside—Advance Rent Reconciliation to Be Examined Afresh; Delay of 656 Days Condoned with ₹5,000 Cost The Assessee, engaged in construction & rental of a commercial mall, filed appeal against NFAC’s ex-parte order dated 24.03.2023, which confirmed an addition of ₹36,29,972 treating “advance rent” as undisclosed rent receipts based on mismatch between booked rent (₹62,81,762) and Form 26AS rent from PVR Ltd (₹99,11,734). Condonation of Delay (656 days) The appeal was filed nearly two years late. The Assessee subm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930