Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Geet Reality Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Geet Reality Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Ex-Parte CIT(A) Order Set Aside—Advance Rent Reconciliation to Be Examined Afresh; Delay of 656 Days Condoned with ₹5,000 Cost The Assessee, engaged in construction & rental of a commercial mall, filed appeal against NFAC’s ex-parte order dated 24.03.2023, which confirmed an addition of ₹36,29,972 treating “advance rent” as undisclosed rent receipts based on mismatch between booked rent (₹62,81,762) and Form 26AS rent from PVR Ltd (₹99,11,734). Condonation of Delay (656 days) The appeal was filed nearly two years late. The Assessee subm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031