Follow Us:

Archive: February, 2026

Posts in February, 2026

5 Hard Truths Every Founder & CFO Must Know About GST Litigation in 2026

February 14, 2026 633 Views 0 comment Print

With GSTAT operational, mismatches are no longer automatically treated as fraud. Strong documentation and intent-based defense now determine litigation outcomes.

How to get GST Refund if the same is not received after filing GSTR 1?

February 14, 2026 936 Views 0 comment Print

Export refunds often get delayed due to GSTN-ICEGATE data mismatches. This guide explains error codes and corrective steps to unlock your IGST refund.

Reopening U/s 147 quashed – Borrowed satisfaction mechanical approval U/s 151 invalid; sale of investments cannot be taxed U/s 68 – ITAT Kolkata

February 14, 2026 300 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that reopening based solely on investigation wing information without independent application of mind is invalid. Mechanical reasons cannot justify reassessment under Section 147.

Why Bill of Entry (BoE) is not reflecting in GSTR 2B?

February 14, 2026 2637 Views 0 comment Print

A practical guide to ensuring Bill of Entry data flows correctly from ICEGATE to GSTR-2B. Proper verification prevents ITC blockage and compliance disputes.

What is Bill of Entry (BoE) under GST?

February 14, 2026 2244 Views 0 comment Print

The Bill of Entry is the key document for paying IGST on imports and claiming Input Tax Credit. Proper GSTIN reporting and data matching are essential to avoid credit denial.

Burden of Proof on Recipient under GST: How Far Must a Bona Fide Buyer Go?

February 14, 2026 2484 Views 0 comment Print

Under GST, the burden of proof falls on the recipient mainly when they claim input tax credit (ITC); this is codified in section 155 and refined by recent court rulings that also protect bona fide buyers from impossible burdens. 1. Statutory basis – when does burden fall on the recipient? Section 155 – specific rule […]

ITAT Kolkata – ₹6.99 Cr Share Capital Addition u/s 68 Deleted; Identity & Genuineness Proved

February 14, 2026 453 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal found that the investors had substantial net worth far exceeding their investments. With PAN, ITRs, bank statements, and audited financials on record, the share capital could not be treated as unexplained.

Delhi HC Expressed Its Indignation At Prolonged Pendency of Bail Applications In Courts

February 14, 2026 357 Views 0 comment Print

The Delhi High Court held that prolonged pendency of bail applications causes trauma and violates the fundamental rights of accused persons. Granting bail in a murder case, the Court stressed that bail pleas must be decided promptly, whether allowed or dis-missed.

Threaded Pipe Fittings Classifiable Under Specific HS Codes, Not Residuary Entry: CAAR Mumbai

February 14, 2026 510 Views 0 comment Print

CAAR Mumbai ruled that internally and externally threaded elbows, bends, tees, sleeves and crosses must be classified under specific tariff headings based on material composition. The Authority held that specific entries prevail over general or residuary classifications under the Customs Tariff Act.

Unexplained investment addition of ₹12.30 Cr deleted – Funds for software project proved; Rule 46A objection rejected – ITAT Delhi

February 14, 2026 609 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal confirmed that once identity, source, and movement of funds are established through records, treating the investment as unexplained is unjustified. Revenues appeal was dismissed.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031