The case examined whether an appeal dismissed as withdrawn under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme could survive when tax payment was uncertain. The Tribunal ruled that actual payment must be verified and remanded the matter for fresh examination.
The addition under Section 69 was remanded as the assessee claimed the source through rotation of funds. The Assessing Officer must now verify the fund flow after granting proper hearing.
Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not exercisable in absence of any perversity in the order passed by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
The Tribunal held that reassessment notices issued after 01.04.2021 for AY 2015-16 are time-barred. Such reopening is invalid despite reliance on TOLA, and must be quashed.
The court held that additions for excess stock and cash cannot be sustained when based solely on a survey statement under Section 133A, reaffirming that such statements lack conclusive evidentiary value.
The Tribunal held that late filing of Form 10CCB is a procedural lapse. Deduction cannot be denied when the audit report is filed before assessment processing.
Holding that actions prescribed by statute must be performed only in the specified manner, the Tribunal deleted the penalty. The case reinforces the importance of lawful service of notices before penal action.
The tribunal held that dismissal for delay and confirmation on merits without effective hearing violated principles of natural justice, warranting remand for fresh adjudication.
The Court held that sanction for reopening was taken under the wrong statutory provision. As a result, the reassessment notice and all consequential orders were set aside.
The Tribunal upheld taxation of enhanced compensation and interest under land acquisition after insertion of section 56(2)(viii). The ruling confirms that such receipts are taxable despite earlier judicial views.
